From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
Cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, h.peter.anvin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86/mbm: Store bytes counted for mbm during recycle
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:02:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425200222.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604251051120.18257@vshiva-Udesk>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:04:38AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> >This is a 'creative' solution; why don't you do the normal thing, which
> >is:
> >
> >start:
> > prev_count = read_hw_counter();
> >
> >read:
> > do {
> > prev = prev_count;
> > cur_val = read_hw_counter();
> > delta = cur_val - prev;
> > } while (local_cmpxchg(&prev_count, prev, cur_val) != prev);
> > count += delta;
>
>
> I may need to update the comment.
>
> rc_count stores the total bytes for RMIDs that were used for this event
> except for the count of current RMID.
Yeah, I got that, eventually.
> Say an event used RMID(1) .. RMID(k) from init to read and it had RMID(k)
> when read was called, the rc_count stores the values read from RMID1 ..
> RMID(k-1).
>
> For MBM the patch is trying to do:
> count
> = total_bytes of RMID(1) + ... +total_bytes of RMID(k-1) + total_bytes of
> RMID(k))
> = rc_count + total_bytes of RMID(k).
How is the regular counting scheme as outlined above not dealing with
this properly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-23 0:27 [PATCH V1 0/4] Urgent fixes for Intel CQM/MBM counting Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf/x86/cqm,mbm: Store cqm,mbm count for all events when RMID is recycled Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:26 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86/mbm: Store bytes counted for mbm during recycle Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 18:04 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-25 21:12 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-05-03 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-04 0:00 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf/x86/mbm: Fix mbm counting when RMIDs are reused Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:44 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 21:43 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 21:49 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf/x86/cqm: Support cqm/mbm only for perf events Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:23 ` Luck, Tony
2016-04-25 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425200222.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox