From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zpool: use workqueue for zpool_destroy
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:18:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425221816.GA1254@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461619210-10057-1-git-send-email-ddstreet@ieee.org>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:20:10PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Add a work_struct to struct zpool, and change zpool_destroy_pool to
> defer calling the pool implementation destroy.
>
> The zsmalloc pool destroy function, which is one of the zpool
> implementations, may sleep during destruction of the pool. However
> zswap, which uses zpool, may call zpool_destroy_pool from atomic
> context. So we need to defer the call to the zpool implementation
> to destroy the pool.
>
> This is essentially the same as Yu Zhao's proposed patch to zsmalloc,
> but moved to zpool.
Thanks, Dan. Sergey also mentioned another call path that triggers the
same problem (BUG: scheduling while atomic):
rcu_process_callbacks()
__zswap_pool_release()
zswap_pool_destroy()
zswap_cpu_comp_destroy()
cpu_notifier_register_begin()
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
So I was thinking zswap_pool_destroy() might be done in workqueue in zswap.c.
This way we fix both call paths.
Or you have another patch to fix the second call path?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1459288977-25562-1-git-send-email-yuzhao@google.com>
[not found] ` <20160329235950.GA19927@bbox>
2016-03-31 8:46 ` [PATCH] zsmalloc: use workqueue to destroy pool in zpool callback Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-31 21:46 ` Yu Zhao
2016-03-31 22:05 ` Dan Streetman
2016-04-25 21:20 ` [PATCH] mm/zpool: use workqueue for zpool_destroy Dan Streetman
2016-04-25 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-25 22:18 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2016-04-26 0:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-26 11:07 ` Dan Streetman
2016-04-26 21:08 ` [PATCH] mm/zswap: use workqueue to destroy pool Dan Streetman
2016-04-27 0:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-27 17:19 ` Dan Streetman
2016-04-28 1:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-28 4:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-28 8:21 ` Dan Streetman
2016-04-28 9:13 ` [PATCH] mm/zswap: provide unique zpool name Dan Streetman
2016-04-28 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-29 0:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-04-29 0:25 ` [PATCH] mm/zswap: use workqueue to destroy pool Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425221816.GA1254@google.com \
--to=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.streetman@canonical.com \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox