From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: fix member type of struct clk_hw_onecell_data
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:27:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425222702.GC29990@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461552642-10732-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On 04/25, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We cannot assign any value to an array type variable. So,
>
> hw_data->hws = kcalloc(hw_data->num, sizeof(struct clk_hw *),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> fails with "invalid use of flexible array member" error.
That's good. We don't want assignment to the hws member of this
structure to happen from an allocation like kcalloc.
>
> There are two ways to fix this issue.
>
> [1] Make it a double-pointer
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> size_t num;
> struct clk_hw **hws;
> };
>
> This works as struct clk_onecell_data does.
True we could go back to the old style with two allocations.
>
> [2] Make it a zero-sized array
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> size_t num;
> struct clk_hw *hws[0];
> };
>
> This allows one-shot memory allocation like this:
>
> hw_data = kmalloc(sizeof(*hw_data) + clk_num * sizeof(struct clk_hw *),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
Good, that was possible before this patch wasn't it?
> This commit adopts [2] because it looks like Stephen's intention
> (he moved hws[] to the bottom of struct clk_hw_onecell_data).
>
> Fixes: 0861e5b8cf80 ("clk: Add clk_hw OF clk providers")
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index fd2ccd5..1850e25 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ struct clk_onecell_data {
>
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> size_t num;
> - struct clk_hw *hws[];
> + struct clk_hw *hws[0];
I'm totally lost now. Isn't a flex array with [] or with [0] the
same? The latter being a GCC extension while the former being a
C99 standard?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 2:50 [PATCH] clk: fix member type of struct clk_hw_onecell_data Masahiro Yamada
2016-04-25 22:27 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-04-26 6:19 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425222702.GC29990@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox