Re: random(4) changes

Pavel Machek
2016-04-26T19:42:00Z

Hi!

> > > > When dropping the add_disk_randomness function in the legacy
> > > > /dev/random, I
> > > > would assume that without changes to add_input_randomness and
> > > > add_interrupt_randomness, we become even more entropy-starved.
> > >
> > > Sure, but your system isn't doing anything magical here. The main
> > > difference is that you assume you can get almost a full bit of entropy
> > > out of each interrupt timing, where I'm much more conservative and
> > > assume we can only get 1/64th of a bit out of each interrupt timing.
> >
> > Maybe 1/64th of a bit is a bit too conservative? I guess we really
> > have more than one bit of entropy on any system with timestamp
> > counter....
> >
> > Making it 1/2 of bit (or something) should be very easy way to improve
> > entropy early during boot...
>
> I can easily settle on 1/2 bit here. The LRNG currently uses 0.9 bits which
> are based on measurements plus a safety margin. But I see no issue to even
> lower it further to, say, 1/2.

No, you don't need to change anything. But maybe mainline rng should
change.

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html