From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752631AbcD0JAK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:00:10 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:33697 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751038AbcD0JAI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:00:08 -0400
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:01:40 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: zram: per-cpu compression streams
Message-ID: <20160427090139.GA1317@swordfish>
References: <20160331055355.GD6736@bbox>
 <20160331063416.GA3343@swordfish>
 <20160401153829.GA1212@swordfish>
 <20160404002757.GC5833@bbox>
 <20160404011702.GB6164@swordfish>
 <20160418075758.GA1983@swordfish>
 <20160419080025.GE18448@bbox>
 <20160426112305.GA1155@swordfish>
 <20160427072954.GA29816@bbox>
 <20160427085408.GA1108@swordfish>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160427085408.GA1108@swordfish>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On (04/27/16 17:54), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> #jobs4                         	                
> READ:           19948MB/s	 20013MB/s
> READ:           17732MB/s	 17479MB/s
> WRITE:          630690KB/s	 495078KB/s
> WRITE:          1843.2MB/s	 2226.9MB/s
> READ:           1603.4MB/s	 1846.8MB/s
> WRITE:          1599.4MB/s	 1842.2MB/s
> READ:           1547.7MB/s	 1740.7MB/s
> WRITE:          1549.2MB/s	 1742.4MB/s

> jobs4
> stalled-cycles-frontend     265,519,049,536 (  64.46%)	  221,049,841,649 (  61.81%)
> stalled-cycles-backend      146,538,881,296 (  35.57%)	  113,774,053,039 (  31.82%)
> instructions                298,241,854,695 (    0.72)	  278,000,866,874 (    0.78)
> branches                     59,531,800,053 ( 400.919)	   55,096,944,109 ( 427.816)
> branch-misses                   285,108,083 (   0.48%)	      260,972,185 (   0.47%)

> seconds elapsed        47.816933840	52.966896478

per-cpu in general looks better in this test (jobs4): less stalls, less
branches, less misses, better fio speeds (except for WRITE: 630690KB/s  495078KB/s).
the system was under pressure, so quite possible that it took more time to kill the
process, thus execution time is in favor of 8 streams test.

	-ss