public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	lizefan@huawei.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/fair: Move (inactive) option from code to config
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:37:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428093733.GX3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459829551-21625-7-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:12:31PM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> The option of increased load resolution (fixed point arithmetic range) is
> unconditionally deactivated with #if 0. But since it may still be used
> somewhere (e.g., in Google), we want to keep this option.
> 
> Regardless, there should be a way to express this option. Considering the
> current circumstances, the reconciliation is we define a config
> CONFIG_CFS_INCREASE_LOAD_RANGE and it depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED and
> 64BIT and BROKEN.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

So I'm very tempted to simply, unconditionally, reinstate this larger
range for everything CONFIG_64BIT && CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.

There was but the single claim on increased power usage, nobody could
reproduce / analyze and Google has been running with this for years now.

Furthermore, it seems to be leading to the obvious problems on bigger
machines where we basically run out of precision by the sheer number of
cpus (nr_cpus ~ SCHED_LOAD_SCALE and stuff comes apart quickly).

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-28  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-05  4:12 [PATCH v3 0/6] sched/fair: Clean up sched metric definitions Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched/fair: Generalize the load/util averages resolution definition Yuyang Du
2016-05-05  9:39   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] sched/fair: Remove SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT and SCHED_LOAD_SCALE Yuyang Du
2016-05-05  9:40   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Rename SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT to NICE_0_LOAD_SHIFT and remove SCHED_LOAD_SCALE tip-bot for Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] sched/fair: Add introduction to the sched load avg metrics Yuyang Du
2016-05-05  9:41   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Add detailed description " tip-bot for Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/fair: Remove scale_load_down() for load_avg Yuyang Du
2016-04-28 10:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28  3:01     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-28 19:29     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched/fair: Rename scale_load() and scale_load_down() Yuyang Du
2016-04-28  9:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 11:18     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-04-28 20:30     ` Yuyang Du
2016-04-05  4:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] sched/fair: Move (inactive) option from code to config Yuyang Du
2016-04-28  9:37   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-28  9:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-28 20:34     ` Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160428093733.GX3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox