From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398AbcD1ROH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:14:07 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55618 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753185AbcD1ROE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:14:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:13:45 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Peter Rosin , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160428171345.GQ3217@sirena.org.uk> References: <1461746959-11443-1-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> <20160427161504.GZ3217@sirena.org.uk> <122ca84a-230e-654e-425f-3adb0ca00ec7@axentia.se> <20160428103822.GJ3217@sirena.org.uk> <20160428111001.GK3217@sirena.org.uk> <20160428114150.GM3217@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TLryreJvNc5+tOdm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Tomorrow, you can be anywhere. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: pcm: allow changing the playback/capture rates for symmetric links X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --TLryreJvNc5+tOdm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:26:49PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > BTW, this reminds me of another question: don't we have a dummy ASoC > > > driver like snd-dummy? It would be convenient for a casual API > > > testing. > > No, someone would need to write a series of dummy drivers that exercised > > the various API features (almost all of which are kernel internal) and > > then instantiated them but nobody stepped up and did that yet. > Well, we don't support all API features there. Developer can modify > the existing code and test it quickly if needed at any time once when Yeah. Though the main use case would be making sure changes hadn't broken any of the more obscure DAPM features (at least, that's the main place where we seem to have issues) so... > the base code is present. So, yeah, we need a volunteer! No problem then :) --TLryreJvNc5+tOdm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXIkTHAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQbFMH/3slQiM1DhZKqXvnHuWjCKF7 zNLdo6VJkC6VZQdPSXvzrzuo3FDQdtbG3iOkp1xFPPbgEe6NXHJ4AAjhPItCODrn WPyhX+aPVCs2dvqHviLIyIEkN4awNQ5kdnrm1PfFCVmkBGq4f3F1/W21H/MtSmw2 k44ZOtO4J/BRxHbPwzd8uu++2wZAM8H1Lz1k1QddK+OQ7SrKj7WFtlaS18pYo6TC 698QqScozmUCO1kLdUrOyFlgmcbvoRvtAzG9xYjGnjsW9jX4TPIoJs+Ndt8t0fhK 0cZ9XtIeoEJBwHFKJsp9iWJyhDXS93Zw7hXgCuW11tUUwl2rs7SIMcluqQKxJ/Y= =39/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TLryreJvNc5+tOdm--