public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@tukaani.org>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/boot: Warn on future overlapping memcpy() use
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:20:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429072002.GD28320@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j+b3Qvh4mpG9yJZJ0OkqCqAWJXx9TnKDwqFoJ8x5=eLrw@mail.gmail.com>


* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> If an overlapping memcpy() is ever attempted, we should at least report
> >> it, in case it might lead to problems, so it could be changed to a
> >> memmove() call instead.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4:
> >> - use __memcpy not memcpy since we've already done the check.
> >> v3:
> >> - call memmove in addition to doing the warning
> >> v2:
> >> - warn about overlapping region
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/string.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks Kees!
> >
> > Btw., can we now also remove the memmove() hack from lib/decompress_unxz.c?
> 
> I'll let Lasse answer for sure, but I don't think so. The original commit says:
> 
>     The XZ decompressor needs memmove(), memeq() (memcmp() == 0), and
>     memzero() (memset(ptr, 0, size)), which aren't available in all
>     arch-specific pre-boot environments.  I'm including simple versions in
>     decompress_unxz.c, but a cleaner solution would naturally be nicer.

I see, so non-x86 architectures might not have the proper runtime environment 
implemented, right?

Fair enough!

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-29  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29  0:18 [PATCH v4] x86/boot: Warn on future overlapping memcpy() use Kees Cook
2016-04-29  6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-29  6:56   ` Kees Cook
2016-04-29  7:20     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-04-29  7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-29 14:17   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160429072002.GD28320@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lasse.collin@tukaani.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox