From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
mike travis <travis@sgi.com>, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86/efi: MMRs no longer properly mapped after switch to isolated page table
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:01:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429090115.GB2839@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427154132.GB113599@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
On Wed, 27 Apr, at 10:41:32AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> From what I know, this works because the first PGD entry (the one
> containing the identity mappings) of the trampoline_pgd is shared with
> the main kernel PGD (init_level4_pgt), so when __map_region maps this
> stuff into the trampoline_pgd, we get it in the kernel PGD as well.
Correct.
> The way I understand it, the motivation behind this change is to isolate
> the EFI runtime services code/data from the regular kernel page tables,
Yep.
> but it appears that we've isolated a bit more than that. I do
> understand that if we were doing an actual EFI callback, we'd switch
> over to the efi_pgd, where we'd have this stuff mapped in, but, until
> now, we've been able to read these MMRs using the regular kernel page
> table without issues.
>
> Please let me know what you guys think about this issue, and if you have
> any suggestions for possible solutions. Any input is greatly
> appreciated!
The issue is that you're relying on the EFI mapping code to map these
regions for you, and that's a bug. These regions have nothing to do
with EFI.
Arguably it's always been a bug. You're not alone though, there were
also other pieces of code piggy-backing on the EFI mapping functions,
and EFI code piggy-backing on the regular kernel mapping functions,
see 452308de6105 ("x86/efi: Fix boot crash by always mapping boot
service regions into new EFI page tables").
I agree with Boris' suggestion that removing the "if (is_uv1_hub())"
check in uv_system_init() is probably the way to go, since it should
always be the responsibility of uv_system_init() to setup these
mappings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 15:41 [BUG] x86/efi: MMRs no longer properly mapped after switch to isolated page table Alex Thorlton
2016-04-27 18:23 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-04-27 22:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-28 1:41 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-04-28 12:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-29 15:41 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-04-30 22:12 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-02 21:39 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-02 22:17 ` Mike Travis
2016-05-09 21:55 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-10 17:35 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-02 10:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-02 22:27 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-03 0:10 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-03 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-03 18:47 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-04 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-04 16:32 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-04-29 9:01 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-04-29 15:45 ` Alex Thorlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160429090115.GB2839@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox