public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
	eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:56:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160503085651.GL3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461771888-10409-6-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:44:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Many instruction trace pmus out there support address range-based
> filtering, which would, for example, generate trace data only for a
> given range of instruction addresses, which is useful for tracing
> individual functions, modules or libraries. Other pmus may also
> utilize this functionality to allow filtering to or filtering out
> code at certain address ranges.
> 
> This patch introduces the interface for userspace to specify these
> filters and for the pmu drivers to apply these filters to hardware
> configuration.
> 
> The user interface is an ascii string that is passed via an ioctl
> and specifies (in the form of an ascii string) address ranges within
> certain object files or within kernel. There is no special treatment
> for kernel modules yet, but it might be a worthy pursuit.
> 
> The pmu driver interface basically add two extra callbacks to the
> pmu driver structure, one of which validates the filter configuration
> proposed by the user against what the hardware is actually capable of
> doing and the other one translates hardware-independent filter
> configuration into something that can be programmed into the
> hardware.

Alexander, could you please write a manpage patch for this new API?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-27 15:44 [PATCH v2 0/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] perf: Move set_filter() from behind EVENT_TRACING Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Move set_filter() out of CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move MSR bit definitions to a private header Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move PT specific " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: IP filtering register/cpuid bits Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add IP filtering register/CPUID bits tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] perf: Extend perf_event_aux_ctx() to optionally iterate through more events Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-28 17:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-29 18:12   ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-04-30  4:59     ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-02 14:31       ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-03  8:56   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add support for address range filtering in PT Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:47   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] perf: Let userspace know if pmu supports address filters Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:47   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Let userspace know if the PMU " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160503085651.GL3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox