From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757243AbcEDGZ0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 May 2016 02:25:26 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33638 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751263AbcEDGZY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 May 2016 02:25:24 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:25:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] SS_AUTODISARM fixes and an ABI change
Message-ID: <20160504062519.GA9499@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1462296606.git.luto@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1462296606.git.luto@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:

> The first three are fixes IMO.  The fourth changes the SS_AUTODISARM
> bit.  I'm assuming that's okay, as the bit has existed in -tip for
> less than a day.

Yeah, it's absolutely OK - I made it a standalone tree so we could even rebase it, 
but I think authorship and intent is clearer with your series on top of Stas's 
original commits.

Thanks,

	Ingo