From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757707AbcEDLIB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 4 May 2016 07:08:01 -0400
Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:53253 "EHLO
	atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757182AbcEDLH7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 May 2016 07:07:59 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:07:55 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Dr. Greg Wettstein" <greg@enjellic.com>
Cc: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Wan Zongshun <Vincent.Wan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions
Message-ID: <20160504110755.GA24151@amd>
References: <1461605698-12385-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20160426190009.GC8162@amd>
 <20160429201744.GD27821@intel.com>
 <142feb98-3a97-0b00-0b17-b029fa2c637f@gmail.com>
 <20160503090627.GA27301@wind.enjellic.com>
 <20160503153840.GB2890@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
 <20160504090427.GA5049@wind.enjellic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160504090427.GA5049@wind.enjellic.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi!

> Good morning, I hope everyone's day is starting out well.

:-). Rainy day here.

> > > In the TL;DR department I would highly recommend that anyone
> > > interested in all of this read MIT's 170+ page review of the
> > > technology before jumping to any conclusions.... :-)
> 
> > Would you have links for 1-5?
> 
> First off my apologies to the list as I loathe personal inaccuracy,
> the MIT review paper is only 117 pages long.  I was typing the last
> e-mail at 0405 in the morning and was scrambling for the opportunity
> to get 50 minutes of sleep so my proofreading was sloppy... :-)

Thanks a lot for the links, I'd still say it was more accurate than
average for the lkml.

Best regards,
								Pavel
								
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html