public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH net-next v2] block/drbd: use nla_put_u64_64bit()
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:52:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160504125253.GP16459@soda.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5729EFBC.7040002@6wind.com>

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 04/05/2016 11:05, Lars Ellenberg a écrit :
> [snip]
> > We don't have an "alignment problem" there, btw.
> > Last time I checked, we did work fine without this alignment magic,
> > we already take care of that, yes, even on affected architectures.
> The code adds several consecutive u64 attributes. The nl attribute header is 4
> bytes, thus the full attribute length is 12 bytes. If the first u64 is aligned
> on 8 (nla_data()), the next one is not aligned on 8: it starts 12 bytes (8 (u64)
> + 4 (nl attr hdr)) after the previous u64.

Yes.  Which in our case is not a problem.
But I don't object to the padding per se,
if that is how things "should be".

I try to understand why you so much object to using 0 as pad.

    Lars

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-26  8:06 [PATCH net-next 0/8] netlink: align attributes when needed (patchset #3) Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] macsec: use nla_put_u64_64bit() Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] drivers/wireless: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] fs/quota: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26 11:08   ` Jan Kara
2016-04-26 12:31     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26 12:37       ` Jan Kara
2016-04-26 16:24     ` David Miller
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] sock_diag: align nlattr properly when needed Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] ovs: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] rtnl: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] neigh: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26  8:06 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] sched: " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-04-26 11:54 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] netlink: align attributes when needed (patchset #3) Lars Ellenberg
2016-04-26 12:18   ` [Drbd-dev] " Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-03  8:50     ` [PATCH net-next] block/drbd: use nla_put_u64_64bit() Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-03  9:28       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-03  9:39         ` [PATCH net-next v2] " Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-03 10:06           ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-03 12:07             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-03 16:05             ` David Miller
2016-05-04  9:05               ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-04 12:49                 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-04 12:52                   ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
2016-05-04 14:27                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-04 16:50                     ` David Miller
2016-05-04 17:13                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-04 16:47                   ` David Miller
2016-05-03 16:06             ` David Miller
2016-05-09  9:40             ` [PATCH net-next v3] block/drbd: align properly u64 in nl messages Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-09 13:15               ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-10  9:09                 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-10  9:40                   ` [Drbd-dev] " Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-10 10:06                     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-05-10 15:39                     ` David Miller
2016-05-10 19:09                       ` Lars Ellenberg
2016-05-10 19:26                         ` David Miller
2016-04-26 16:25   ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] netlink: align attributes when needed (patchset #3) David Miller
2016-04-26 16:02 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160504125253.GP16459@soda.linbit \
    --to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox