Re: [PATCH V3 06/17] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ

Marc Zyngier
2016-05-09T12:23:31Z

On 04/05/16 17:25, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Some IRQ chips, such as GPIO controllers or secondary level interrupt
> controllers, may require require additional runtime power management
> control to ensure they are accessible. For such IRQ chips, it makes sense
> to enable the IRQ chip when interrupts are requested and disabled them
> again once all interrupts have been freed.
>
> When mapping an IRQ, the IRQ type settings are read and then programmed.
> The mapping of the IRQ happens before the IRQ is requested and so the
> programming of the type settings occurs before the IRQ is requested. This
> is a problem for IRQ chips that require additional power management
> control because they may not be accessible yet. Therefore, when mapping
> the IRQ, don't program the type settings, just save them and then program
> these saved settings when the IRQ is requested (so long as if they are not
> overridden via the call to request the IRQ).
>
> Add a stub function for irq_domain_free_irqs() to avoid any compilation
> errors when CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY is not selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 2aed04396210..fc66876d1965 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static inline int irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static inline void irq_domain_free_irqs(unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs) { }
> +
> static inline bool irq_domain_is_hierarchy(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index d68371213fc9..bbf5b9b8ac3d 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -564,6 +564,7 @@ static void of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(struct of_phandle_args *irq_data,
> unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct irq_fwspec *fwspec)
> {
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> + struct irq_data *irq_data;
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> unsigned int type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> int virq;
> @@ -613,7 +614,11 @@ unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct irq_fwspec *fwspec)
> * it now and return the interrupt number.
> */
> if (irq_get_trigger_type(virq) == IRQ_TYPE_NONE) {
> - irq_set_irq_type(virq, type);
> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> + if (!irq_data)
> + return 0;
> +
> + irqd_set_trigger_type(irq_data, type);
> return virq;
> }
>
> @@ -633,10 +638,18 @@ unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct irq_fwspec *fwspec)
> return virq;
> }
>
> - /* Set type if specified and different than the current one */
> - if (type != IRQ_TYPE_NONE &&
> - type != irq_get_trigger_type(virq))
> - irq_set_irq_type(virq, type);
> + irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
> + if (!irq_data) {
> + if (irq_domain_is_hierarchy(domain))
> + irq_domain_free_irqs(virq, 1);
> + else
> + irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Store trigger type */
> + irqd_set_trigger_type(irq_data, type);
> +
> return virq;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_create_fwspec_mapping);
>

This patch have the effect of making misconfigured PPIs absolutely
obvious. I still need to wrap my head around the root cause, but here's
the findings I have so far:

- kvmtool generates a DT with the wrong trigger information (edge
instead of level) for the timer.
- with this patch applied, "cyclictest -S" reliably locks up when run in
a guest (missing a timer interrupt, goodbye CPU).
- Either fixing kvmtool or reverting that patch makes it work reliably
again.

My gut feeling is that until that patch, the failing irq_set_irq_type()
wasn't affecting the kernel's view of the trigger (it was still treated
as level). With this patch, the kernel now trusts whatever is coming
from the firmware, and the misconfiguration becomes obvious. And just
grepping through the DT files for arm and arm64 sends makes me thing
"Holly effin' crap!".

I'm not saying that we shouldn't perform this change though. But it is
quite obvious that it is going to break an awful lot of existing code
and platforms. I'm also cooking a small patch for the arch timer (which
seems to be described in DT with a fairly high level of brokenness), so
that we can mop-up most of the brain damage.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...