linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 06:03:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510130319.GA18389@linux-uzut.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462580424-40333-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

On Fri, 06 May 2016, Waiman Long wrote:

>Currently, it is not possible to determine for sure if a reader
>owns a rwsem by looking at the content of the rwsem data structure.
>This patch adds a new state RWSEM_READER_OWNED to the owner field
>to indicate that readers currently own the lock. This enables us to
>address the following 2 issues in the rwsem optimistic spinning code:
>
> 1) rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() will disallow optimistic spinning if
>    the owner field is NULL which can mean either the readers own
>    the lock or the owning writer hasn't set the owner field yet.
>    In the latter case, we miss the chance to do optimistic spinning.
>
> 2) While a writer is spinning and a reader takes the lock, the writer
>    will continue to spin in the main rwsem_optimistic_spin() loop as
>    the owner is NULL.
>
>Adding the new state will allow optimistic spinning to go forward as
>long as the owner field is not RWSEM_READER_OWNED and the owner is
>running, if set, but stop immediately when that state has been reached.
>
>On a 4-socket Haswell machine running on a 4.6-rc1 based kernel, the
>fio test with multithreaded randrw and randwrite tests on the same
>file on a XFS partition on top of a NVDIMM were run, the aggregated
>bandwidths before and after the patch were as follows:
>
>  Test      BW before patch     BW after patch  % change
>  ----      ---------------     --------------  --------
>  randrw         988 MB/s          1192 MB/s      +21%
>  randwrite     1513 MB/s          1623 MB/s      +7.3%
>
>The perf profile of the rwsem_down_write_failed() function in randrw
>before and after the patch were:
>
>   19.95%  5.88%  fio  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] rwsem_down_write_failed
>   14.20%  1.52%  fio  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] rwsem_down_write_failed
>
>The actual CPU cycles spend in rwsem_down_write_failed() dropped from
>5.88% to 1.52% after the patch.
>
>The xfstests was also run and no regression was observed.
>
>Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-07  0:20 [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field Waiman Long
2016-05-07  4:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-05-08  3:04   ` Waiman Long
2016-05-09  8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10  2:24   ` Waiman Long
2016-05-10  7:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 18:44 ` Jason Low
2016-05-10 13:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2016-05-11 22:04 ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-12 20:15   ` Waiman Long
2016-05-12 21:27     ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-12 23:13       ` Waiman Long
2016-05-13 15:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-13 17:58     ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-15 14:47       ` Waiman Long
2016-05-16 11:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-16 12:17         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-16 14:17           ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-16 17:22             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-17 19:46               ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-17 19:53                 ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-16 17:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-17 19:15               ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-17 19:46                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-18 11:05                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-18 15:56                     ` Waiman Long
2016-05-18 17:28                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-18 17:26                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-19  9:00                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-19 13:43                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-05-19  1:37 ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-19  8:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 22:56   ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160510130319.GA18389@linux-uzut.site \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).