From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752177AbcEKWXh (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 18:23:37 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33478 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751617AbcEKWXg (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 18:23:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 23:23:31 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi Subject: Re: linux-next: suspect commits in the vfs tree Message-ID: <20160511222331.GQ2694@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20160512073153.4132026e@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160512073153.4132026e@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 07:31:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Al, > > I noticed these commits in today's vfs tree: > > 38b78a5f1858 ovl: ignore permissions on underlying lookup > 3c9fe8cdff1b vfs: add lookup_hash() helper > 9409e22acdfc vfs: rename: check backing inode being equal > 54d5ca871e72 vfs: add vfs_select_inode() helper > > They are all committed by you , but have no Signed-off-by from you. > > These commits are also in the overlayfs tree (since that has been rebased > on top of them). That's a branch from Miklos with a fixup folded into the first of four; I didn't want to bother with extra roundtrip and folded the fixup in-place. Hadn't noticed the lack of S-o-b until after I'd pushed, TBH...