From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752576AbcELHt2 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 12 May 2016 03:49:28 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35751 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752083AbcELHt1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 May 2016 03:49:27 -0400
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:49:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuacct: Merge cpuacct_usage_index and
 cpuacct_usage_index
Message-ID: <20160512074922.GB31930@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1462901697.git.zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <7e8a1b3f687f04c352e74ae8ca1a47335868f1fe.1462901697.git.zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7e8a1b3f687f04c352e74ae8ca1a47335868f1fe.1462901697.git.zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> These two types have similar function.
> No need to separate them.

My question, have you read the title you've written for this patch _even once_??

Thanks,

	Ingo