Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:

> This is Part 1 of previous 13 XSAVES patches. Break it down to
> smaller series. There are no code changes; only minor fixes in
> the titles.
> 
> Fenghua Yu (3):
>   x86/fpu/xstate: Define and use fpu_user_xstate_size
>   x86/fpu/xstate: Rename xstate_size to fpu_kernel_xstate_size to
>     distinguish from fpu_user_xstate_size
>   x86/fpu/xstate: Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for
>     init optimization
> 
> Yu-cheng Yu (1):
>   x86/fpu/xstate: Copy xstate registers directly to signal frame when
>     compacted format is in use
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |  3 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c        |  7 +--
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c        | 21 +++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c      | 32 ++++++++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c      | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

Hm, the series does not apply cleanly:

 patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
 patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
 patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
 patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
 patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
 Hunk #4 FAILED at 552.
 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c

which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo