From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:50:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160520165008.GA13088@test-lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160520071200.GC4003@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 552.
> 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
>
> which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?
There are differences in tip/master and tip/x86/core. The main thing is
using boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) or cpu_has_xsaves. My understanding
is boot_cpu_has() is where we are going and basing on tip/master is easier for
merging?
Thanks,
Yu-cheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-20 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 16:34 [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1 Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-12 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/fpu/xstate: Define and use fpu_user_xstate_size Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-12 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/fpu/xstate: Rename xstate_size to fpu_kernel_xstate_size to distinguish from fpu_user_xstate_size Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-12 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/fpu/xstate: Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for init optimization Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-12 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/fpu/xstate: Copy xstate registers directly to signal frame when compacted format is in use Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-20 7:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1 Ingo Molnar
2016-05-20 15:41 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2016-05-20 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-05-20 16:50 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-20 17:47 Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160520165008.GA13088@test-lenovo \
--to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox