public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: siginfo memory leak?
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:43:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523144319.7579e75f@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523111630.GN2278@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:16:30 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> Aleksa has reported that strace tells a bogus si_errno while debugging
> something on s390:
> [pid 20799] --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_errno=2510266, si_addr=0x100000000000000}

That is a bug.
 
> A quick look into do_sigsegv shows that siginfo is not completely
> initialized and it indeed might leak the previous stack content
> which will later gets to userspace. So unless I am missing something
> we need something like the trivial patch below. I have tried to look
> around and it seems that this is not the only place...

Indeed, for s390 four bytes of the kernel stack gets leaked to user space.
That needs fixing.

> x86 do_error_trap doesn't do any initialization at all! It is hard to
> tell other places. I have checked some and most of them do some
> (partial) initialization.
> 
> So my primary question is whether we want to fix all those potential
> places one by one or come up with something more systematic (e.g. a
> macro to declare on stack siginfo). Btw. I am not even sure partial
> initializations are correct and memset should be used unconditioanlly
> (e.g. fill_sigtrap_info does do that).
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> index 791a4146052c..41913fac14e4 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static noinline void do_sigsegv(struct pt_regs *regs, int si_code)
>  	si.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
>  	si.si_code = si_code;
>  	si.si_addr = (void __user *)(regs->int_parm_long & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK);
> +	si.si_errno = 0;
>  	force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &si, current);
>  }
> 

The other for place where s390 calls force_sig_info are correct.
Only do_sigsegv misses the clear of si_errno.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index ade185a46b1d..f8b66ddbb47d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ static void do_error_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code, char *str,
> 
>  	if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, str, regs, error_code, trapnr, signr) !=
>  			NOTIFY_STOP) {
> +		memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>  		conditional_sti(regs);
>  		do_trap(trapnr, signr, str, regs, error_code,
>  			fill_trap_info(regs, signr, trapnr, &info));
> 

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23 11:16 siginfo memory leak? Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 12:43 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2016-05-23 13:05   ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 13:29     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-05-23 13:34       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 13:43 ` [PATCH] s390: fix info leak in do_sigsegv Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 14:47   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-05-23 13:54 ` [PATCH] x86: fix potential memleak in do_error_trap Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 15:33   ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-05-23 17:47     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-23 15:42 ` siginfo memory leak? Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160523144319.7579e75f@mschwide \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox