From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754829AbcEWPm7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2016 11:42:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34051 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbcEWPm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2016 11:42:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:42:53 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Michal Hocko Cc: Aleksa Sarai , LKML , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: siginfo memory leak? Message-ID: <20160523154253.GB8449@redhat.com> References: <20160523111630.GN2278@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160523111630.GN2278@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Mon, 23 May 2016 15:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/23, Michal Hocko wrote: > > x86 do_error_trap doesn't do any initialization at all! it actually does, please see fill_trap_info() although I'll try to re-check if it initializes everything we need. Oleg.