From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753468AbcEXTFO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 24 May 2016 15:05:14 -0400
Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:58150 "EHLO
	one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752342AbcEXTFL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 24 May 2016 15:05:11 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:05:07 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return"
Message-ID: <20160524190507.GX13997@two.firstfloor.org>
References: <1464051145-19968-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20160524145702.GT8897@kernel.org>
 <574480AB.2000701@intel.com>
 <20160524181052.GW8897@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160524181052.GW8897@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> > What about beautifying the sample flags i.e. instead of displaying the
> > letters interpret them into something more human readable e.g.
> 
> Looks like a good idea, but can't this be done on top of what he sent?

Yes it both makes sense together.
-Andi