From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932292AbcEXT2q (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 15:28:46 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:45790 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751527AbcEXT2o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 15:28:44 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,360,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="708297560" Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:28:43 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Andi Kleen , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return" Message-ID: <20160524192843.GC22049@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1464051145-19968-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20160524145702.GT8897@kernel.org> <574480AB.2000701@intel.com> <20160524181052.GW8897@kernel.org> <20160524190507.GX13997@two.firstfloor.org> <5744AA15.8010306@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5744AA15.8010306@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It looks like it synths 2 samples for each return (one "branches" and > one "return"), which I would expect would mess up the thread_stack pairing > calls and returns. Did you intend to have 2 samples? No it should be only one. I'll check. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only