From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161741AbcE3Rn3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 13:43:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53297 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161249AbcE3Rn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 13:43:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 19:43:24 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , LKML , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] proc, oom: drop bogus task_lock and mm check Message-ID: <20160530174324.GA25382@redhat.com> References: <1464613556-16708-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1464613556-16708-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464613556-16708-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Mon, 30 May 2016 17:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30, Michal Hocko wrote: > > both oom_adj_write and oom_score_adj_write are using task_lock, > check for task->mm and fail if it is NULL. This is not needed because > the oom_score_adj is per signal struct so we do not need mm at all. > The code has been introduced by 3d5992d2ac7d ("oom: add per-mm oom > disable count") but we do not do per-mm oom disable since c9f01245b6a7 > ("oom: remove oom_disable_count"). > > The task->mm check is even not correct because the current thread might > have exited but the thread group might be still alive - e.g. thread > group leader would lead that echo $VAL > /proc/pid/oom_score_adj would > always fail with EINVAL while /proc/pid/task/$other_tid/oom_score_adj > would succeed. This is unexpected at best. > > Remove the lock along with the check to fix the unexpected behavior > and also because there is not real need for the lock in the first place. ACK and we should also remove lock_task_sighand(). as for oom_adj_read() and oom_score_adj_read() we can just remove it right now; it was previously needed to ensure the task->signal != NULL, today this is always true. Oleg.