public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: Clean up attach_entity_load_avg()
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:49:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160531004954.GP18670@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160531083402.GI3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:34:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:32:54AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -2961,24 +2961,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se, int update_tg)
> >  
> >  static void attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> >  {
> > -	if (!sched_feat(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD))
> > -		goto skip_aging;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If we got migrated (either between CPUs or between cgroups) we'll
> > -	 * have aged the average right before clearing @last_update_time.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (se->avg.last_update_time) {
> > -		__update_load_avg(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)),
> > -				  &se->avg, 0, 0, NULL);
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * XXX: we could have just aged the entire load away if we've been
> > -		 * absent from the fair class for too long.
> > -		 */
> > -	}
> > -
> > -skip_aging:
> >  	se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> >  	cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += se->avg.load_avg;
> >  	cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += se->avg.load_sum;
> 
> So I'm not a big fan of this patch; the aging is a conceptual part of
> attaching the load, the fact that it only happens in one callsite is a
> mere 'accident'.

Strictly in concept, it is part of load dealing, maybe not load attaching, :)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30 22:32 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched/fair: Skip attach and detach for new group task in task_move_group_fair() Yuyang Du
2016-05-30 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: Clean up attach_entity_load_avg() Yuyang Du
2016-05-31  8:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-31  0:49     ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-05-31  9:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-31 18:37     ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-30 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Skip detach and attach new group task Yuyang Du
2016-05-31 11:55   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-31 12:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-31 12:33       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-31 12:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-31 13:20           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-30 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: Add inline to detach_entity_load_evg() Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160531004954.GP18670@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox