From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161755AbcFAQnl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:43:41 -0400
Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:36693 "EHLO vena.lwn.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161628AbcFAQng (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:43:36 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:43:33 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] pkeys: add details of system call use to
 Documentation/
Message-ID: <20160601104333.7c2014fa@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160531152824.2B18E890@viggo.jf.intel.com>
References: <20160531152814.36E0B9EE@viggo.jf.intel.com>
	<20160531152824.2B18E890@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 31 May 2016 08:28:24 -0700
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:

> +There are 5 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
> +
> +	int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights)
> +	int pkey_free(int pkey);
> +	int sys_pkey_mprotect(unsigned long start, size_t len,
> +			      unsigned long prot, int pkey);
> +	unsigned long pkey_get(int pkey);
> +	int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long access_rights);

sys_pkey_mprotect() should just be pkey_mprotect(), right?

jon