From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758172AbcFAMyQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:54:16 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:49602 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752157AbcFAMyO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:54:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:54:07 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vincent Guittot Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjt@google.com, yuyang.du@intel.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect sched_entity movement into task_group's utilization Message-ID: <20160601125407.GA28447@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1464080252-17209-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464080252-17209-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Ensure that the changes of the utilization of a sched_entity will be > reflected in the task_group hierarchy. > > This patch tries another way than the flat utilization hierarchy proposal > to ensure the changes will be propagated down to the root cfs. Which would be: lkml.kernel.org/r/1460327765-18024-5-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com Right? Yuyang, there were some issues with the patches leading up to that proposal, were you going to update the flat util thing without those patches or can you find yourself in Vince's patches? (just so I can get a picture of what all patches to look at when reviewing)