From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753076AbcFFObT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:31:19 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58939 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752872AbcFFOaT (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:30:19 -0400
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 07:30:01 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jyoti singh <jssengar92@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jyoti Singh <jssengar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: Prefer pr_* instead of printk
Message-ID: <20160606143001.GA4181@kroah.com>
References: <1465051511-10758-1-git-send-email-jssengar92@gmail.com>
 <20160604163640.GA6559@kroah.com>
 <CADAjwjQq5u2LYeOQa-L5BJ40hTYcp-23PiBLLHABznVhvkHRUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160605150322.GB14267@kroah.com>
 <CADAjwjSiztcEVMrZEAj34QJK+sn6E8P98edE8Y7=udXYfYWv_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADAjwjRg0cXqb_5xjq0=aK8p=P1j20AwSRpsPdXuNKKKGUipcw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADAjwjRg0cXqb_5xjq0=aK8p=P1j20AwSRpsPdXuNKKKGUipcw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:44:07AM +0530, jyoti singh wrote:
> yes sir,
> I have written a tty driver module there i had used printk and pr_*.
> it is working fine with both.

That's not the answer to my question, did you test _this_ driver with
_these_ changes?  Or at least I think that was what my question was, I
don't see it here in the context so I don't remember...

greg k-h