From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: do not allow access outside of unmap_pool
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:35:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607060519.GF16910@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463486446-13890-1-git-send-email-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:00:46PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> When CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is defined, unmap_pool[] is just 1
> element in size, however, allows orders of 2..8 to access
> outside unmap_pool and returns an invalid address. Ensure
> we fall into the default path and report a BUG() when
> CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is defined and order is out of range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 8c9f45f..6027e66 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -1100,12 +1100,14 @@ static struct dmaengine_unmap_pool *__get_unmap_pool(int nr)
> switch (order) {
> case 0 ... 1:
> return &unmap_pool[0];
> + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID)
Okay if CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is enabled (m or y) then IS_ENABLED
return 1, so we will go inside and not fall into default. And I though
by changelog that you want it to go to default in CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID
is defined!
What did I miss...
> case 2 ... 4:
> return &unmap_pool[1];
> case 5 ... 7:
> return &unmap_pool[2];
> case 8:
> return &unmap_pool[3];
> + #endif
> default:
> BUG();
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.8.1
>
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 12:00 [PATCH] dmaengine: do not allow access outside of unmap_pool Colin King
2016-06-07 6:05 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-23 9:24 Xulin Sun
2016-08-23 9:51 ` Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607060519.GF16910@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox