From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754173AbcFGIZf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 04:25:35 -0400
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:44557 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751442AbcFGIZd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 04:25:33 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,432,1459839600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="982378683"
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:25:27 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
        Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class
Message-ID: <20160607082527.GB19620@kuha.fi.intel.com>
References: <1463661894-22820-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
 <20160603202001.GB11253@amd>
 <20160606134509.GB11617@kuha.fi.intel.com>
 <20160606144128.GC4758@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160606144128.GC4758@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:41:28AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:45:09PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > For consistency, should this be either type-c/type-c.c or
> > > typec/typec.c?
> > 
> > For some reason I like to have the dash in the folder name, but I
> > don't like the idea that the port driver would be in form
> > type-c_something. I would prefer them to be named typec_something. Or
> > maybe just "something" and also name the typec.c maybe class.c or
> > core.c.
> > 
> > Is this a big problem? I guess we could just name the folder "typec".
> > Guenter, whats your opinion?
> 
> "typec" please.

OK, typec it is.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki