From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] rtmutex: Clean up
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 21:56:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607200215.923213194@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20160607195635.710022345@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-cleanup-rt-mutex-2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3949 bytes --]
Previous patches changed the meaning of the return value of
rt_mutex_slowunlock(); update comments and code to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 12 ++++++------
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = this->pi_state;
u32 uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
WAKE_Q(wake_q);
- bool deboost;
+ bool postunlock;
int ret = 0;
if (!pi_state)
@@ -1327,17 +1327,17 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- deboost = rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
+ postunlock = rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
/*
* First unlock HB so the waiter does not spin on it once he got woken
- * up. Second wake up the waiter before the priority is adjusted. If we
- * deboost first (and lose our higher priority), then the task might get
- * scheduled away before the wake up can take place.
+ * up. Then wakeup the waiter by calling rt_mutex_postunlock(). Priority
+ * is already adjusted and preemption is disabled to avoid inversion.
*/
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
- rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
+ if (postunlock)
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
return 0;
}
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(s
/*
* Slow path to release a rt-mutex.
- * Return whether the current task needs to undo a potential priority boosting.
+ *
+ * Return whether the current task needs to call rt_mutex_postunlock().
*/
static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
@@ -1327,7 +1328,7 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- /* check PI boosting */
+ /* call rt_mutex_postunlock() */
return true;
}
@@ -1378,15 +1379,14 @@ rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lo
}
/*
- * Undo pi boosting (if necessary) and wake top waiter.
+ * Performs the wakeup of the the top-waiter and re-enables preemption.
*/
-void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost)
+void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
wake_up_q(wake_q);
/* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
- if (deboost)
- preempt_enable();
+ preempt_enable();
}
/**
@@ -1489,9 +1489,8 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_m
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
} else {
- bool deboost = rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock, &wake_q);
-
- rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
+ if (rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock, &wake_q))
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
@@ -1500,8 +1499,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
* rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant of rt_mutex_unlock
* @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
*
- * Returns: true/false indicating whether priority adjustment is
- * required or not.
+ * Returns: true/false indicating whether we should call rt_mutex_postunlock().
*/
bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wqh)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(st
extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wqh);
-extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost);
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q);
extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 19:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PI and assorted failings Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 9:09 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 13:20 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 16:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-14 17:01 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 18:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] sched/rtmutex/deadline: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 10:21 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 12:53 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-06-14 13:07 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 16:39 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-14 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 16:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 10:43 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-15 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_fastunlock() Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 16:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-06-07 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-14 12:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] rtmutex: Clean up Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 12:41 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio() Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 13:14 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 19:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] rtmutex: Fix PI chain order integrity Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 17:39 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-14 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 7:25 ` Juri Lelli
2016-06-27 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 12:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-28 9:05 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607200215.923213194@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox