From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756591AbcFHPQQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:16:16 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:19186 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751645AbcFHPQN (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:16:13 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:16:04 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rostedt@goodmis.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, pavel@ucw.cz, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL arm] Use _rcuidle tracepoints to allow tracing from idle Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20160526162606.GA20023@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160526162727.GA21784@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160608133350.GA18357@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608133350.GA18357@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16060815-0016-0000-0000-000003E26329 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16060815-0017-0000-0000-00002FFF257B Message-Id: <20160608151604.GA4104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-06-08_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1606080174 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:33:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 09:26:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > This series changes a number of event tracepoints to their _rcuidle() form > > > to allow use from idle without lockdep-RCU complaints, a straightforward > > > modification that has been successfully applied many times. These splats > > > were found in testing by Guenter Roeck and Tony Lindgren, who have > > > both successfully tested the full series. Tony asked that I carry these > > > in -rcu: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160426213630.GV5995@atomide.com > > > > > > These have been posted to LKML, CCing relevant maintainers, who have > > > not objected to the proposed changes: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160516184844.GA20144@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > > > > > These maintainers are also CCed on this pull request. > > > > > > They have also been subjected to 0day Test Robot and -next testing. > > > > And this time actually including the pull request... :-/ > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > These changes are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git for-mingo > > > > for you to fetch changes up to e7c38dda94b23965a3eb46ef4656bb8cb921933d: > > > > arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle (2016-05-18 11:55:29 -0700) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Paul E. McKenney (6): > > arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle > > arm: Use _rcuidle for suspend/resume tracepoints > > arm: Add _rcuidle tracepoints to allow clk_core_disable() use from idle > > arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_idle() use from idle > > arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_resume() to be called from idle > > arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle > > > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 9 +++++---- > > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 14 +++++++------- > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++++---- > > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > Just wondering, wouldn't it be better for Russell to pull/apply, as it appears to > be a mostly ARM patch-set? Fair enough -- I can always repost the patches to their respective maintainers if you are in any way uncomfortable taking them. The patches do not depend on each other. Thanx, Paul