From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934131AbcFIGsN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 02:48:13 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:34044 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933293AbcFIGsJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 02:48:09 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:48:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        cmilsted@redhat.com, Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, m@bues.ch,
        "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple
 AirPort card
Message-ID: <20160609064803.GA10996@gmail.com>
References: <82c2548dffc6cfbc484b9111b1073f407c946061.1464477483.git.lukas@wunner.de>
 <tip-625a99d9bfd038ea492f57308555bf4e607ce591@git.kernel.org>
 <CAE9FiQVapnZ8akNWLo-c8sD4enA1qGcW50vmv7_-9g78Hsm4sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160608200929.GA18981@wunner.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160608200929.GA18981@wunner.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote:

> > How do you know that sec is valid ?
> > 
> > How about on the system that have one bridge that still have sec num register 0?
> > 
> > it will be get into dead loop.
> 
> Good point. I've just checked pci_scan_bridge() and it does verify that and 
> avoids recursing to a child bus if it's number is zero. It also ensures that sec
> > num before recursing.
> 
> I can provide a follow-up patch to fix that, will wait a bit though to see if 
> there are further comments.

Please send a delta fix on top of x86/urgent. (I'll probably squash the two fixes 
together.)

Thanks,

	Ingo