From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1425511AbcFIIDq (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 04:03:46 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:55795 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161123AbcFIIDl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 04:03:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 01:03:38 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Nishanth Menon , Grygorii Strashko , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: Enable Errata 430973 for OMAP3 Message-ID: <20160609080337.GO22406@atomide.com> References: <1463700017-18527-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20160609071512.GK22406@atomide.com> <20160609075734.GA8595@earth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20160609075734.GA8595@earth> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Sebastian Reichel [160609 01:00]: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:15:13AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Nishanth Menon [160519 16:23]: > > > Enable Erratum 430973 similar to commit 5c86c5339c56 ("ARM: > > > omap2plus_defconfig: Enable ARM erratum 430973 for omap3") - Since > > > multiple defconfigs can exist from various points of view (multi_v7, > > > omap2plus etc.. it is always better to enable the erratum from the > > > Kconfig selection point of view so that downstream kernels dont have > > > to rediscover this all over again. > > > > This should safe to select now. Note that proc-v7.S still does not > > do anything with multiarch to configure it. So the bootloader still > > needs to enable it, or it needs to be done in the machine init like > > n900 does. > > mh I totally forgot about 430973. I still think [0] is the > better solution. IIRC I never uploaded them to Russel's > patchsystem, though :( > > [0] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2002603 Sure makes sense to me. Meanwhile, Nishanth's patch prevents hitting the same issue over and over. Regards, Tony