From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752654AbcFIN4u (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 09:56:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34824 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbcFIN4q (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 09:56:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:57:21 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" , LINUXKERNEL , Support Opensource Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing documentation and header files Message-ID: <20160609135721.GC2385@dell> References: <20160524081038.85F443FAAB@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com> <20160608141911.GK7510@sirena.org.uk> <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB70173DA4272@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> <20160608174418.GO7510@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160608174418.GO7510@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:25:30PM +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: > > On 08 June 2016 15:19, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > We *really* shouldn't be blocking on my ack for trivial changes outside > > > the subsystem like this though :( > > > There had been no reply since my first e-mail round about a month ago, so I > > figured there was something wrong with the patch submission. > > It was the activity pattern on the patch more than anything else, and of > course the merge window was in that month as well. > > > In future I will split up the responsibility and define the Subject line better to > > remove any ambiguity. > > Like I say a trivial maintainers update like this really should just get > applied anyway. Right. I was about to apply this regardless. The issue was not specific to this patch. I tend to go dark during the merge-window to concentrate on my 'real job' (TM). I applied your other patch because it's the one I came across first. This one was marked as "to review" (as I am doing now). Don't worry about splitting, I will apply this and remove the other. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog