public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hmh@hmh.eng.br, elliott@hpe.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Quieten down microcode updates on large systems
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:54:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610095439.GA6706@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160609134141.5981-1-andi@firstfloor.org>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:41:41AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> On large systems the microcode driver is very noisy, because it prints
> a line for each CPU. The lines are redundant because because usually
> all CPUs are updated to the same microcode revision.
> 
> All other subsystems have been patched previously to not print
> a line for each CPU. Only the microcode driver is left.
> 
> Only print an microcode revision update when something changed. This results
> in typically only a single line being printed.
> 
> v2: Change message to "One or more CPUs"
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index cbb3cf0..54f5f6c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
>  
>  static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
>  {
> +	static struct cpu_signature prev;
>  	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
>  	unsigned int val[2];
>  
> @@ -808,8 +809,14 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
>  	}
>  
>  	csig->rev = c->microcode;
> -	pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
> -		cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
> +
> +	/* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
> +	if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf ||
> +	    csig->rev != prev.rev) {
> +		pr_info("One or more CPUs sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",

This "One or more CPUs" is just silly. I've removed it while applying.
This way, there's no mentioning of CPUs and people can check
/proc/cpuinfo for that.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-10 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-09 13:41 [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Quieten down microcode updates on large systems Andi Kleen
2016-06-09 23:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-06-10  9:54 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-06-14 11:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not issue microcode updates messages on each CPU tip-bot for Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-31 21:22 [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Quieten down microcode updates on large systems Andi Kleen
2016-06-09  4:34 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2016-06-09 15:47   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160610095439.GA6706@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=elliott@hpe.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox