From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] task_work: use READ_ONCE/lockless_dereference, avoid pi_lock if !task_works
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:00:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610150042.GA13868@redhat.com> (raw)
Change task_work_cancel() to use lockless_dereference(), this is what the
code really wants but we didn't have this helper when it was written.
Also add the fast-path task->task_works == NULL check, in the likely case
this task has no pending works and we can avoid spin_lock(task->pi_lock).
While at it, change other users of ACCESS_ONCE() to use READ_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/task_work.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index 53fa971..175f67a 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, bool notify)
struct callback_head *head;
do {
- head = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
+ head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works);
if (unlikely(head == &work_exited))
return -ESRCH;
work->next = head;
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works;
struct callback_head *work;
unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (likely(!task->task_works))
+ return NULL;
/*
* If cmpxchg() fails we continue without updating pprev.
* Either we raced with task_work_add() which added the
@@ -64,8 +67,7 @@ task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
* we raced with task_work_run(), *pprev == NULL/exited.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
- while ((work = ACCESS_ONCE(*pprev))) {
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
+ while ((work = lockless_dereference(*pprev))) {
if (work->func != func)
pprev = &work->next;
else if (cmpxchg(pprev, work, work->next) == work)
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ void task_work_run(void)
* work_exited unless the list is empty.
*/
do {
- work = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works);
+ work = READ_ONCE(task->task_works);
head = !work && (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ?
&work_exited : NULL;
} while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, work, head) != work);
--
2.5.0
reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160610150042.GA13868@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox