From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753314AbcFJRj5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:39:57 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:44605 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752113AbcFJRjy (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:39:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:37:12 -0500 From: Bin Liu To: joerg Reisenweber CC: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Tony Lindgren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , , , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Aaro Koskinen , Pavel Machek , Nishanth Menon , Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: Nokia N900: musb is in wrong state after boot Message-ID: <20160610173712.GC28283@uda0271908> Mail-Followup-To: Bin Liu , joerg Reisenweber , Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Tony Lindgren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Aaro Koskinen , Pavel Machek , Nishanth Menon , Felipe Balbi References: <201601091616.04193@pali> <86213272.dICX26rd7d@saturn> <20160610155940.GB28283@uda0271908> <2592499.y1ehgT9o2a@saturn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2592499.y1ehgT9o2a@saturn> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:15:26PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote: > On Fri 10 June 2016 10:59:40 Bin Liu wrote: > > The musb ug says the testmde is not used in normal operation, so my > > opinion is force_host should not be used for hacking n900 host mode if > > this is for real product development or support. > > You're aware N900 OS aka maemo is a) FOSS, and b) EOL at least from Nokia's > POV? So there's neither "product development" nor any _'official'_ support > involved. > And c) we (community) already _did_ use it since it was the only chance to > make hostmode sort of work for N900, it's not like we could redesign N900 > hardware to support regular hostmode, we need to work with what RL gave us. Well, misunderstanding does happening as Nishanth warned me offline :( > It evades me why you discourage resp reject this established solution. Not sure how you concluded I reject this. Instead I am taking patches. The only thing I did was warning that if you use force_host testmode in normal operation in your 'products', you would get liability problem. > Just Nokia not supporting hostmode evidently doesn't mean we can't get > anything done, and I don't see why we should refrain from doing so. Regards, -Bin.