From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] events/uprobes: move smp_read_barrier_depends() where needed
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:36:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610193652.GA14622@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPZ9YJYPynX2vGgFarhiyUN0GF--h6r2kbhJ4pRt2NMY1qCODg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/10, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 06/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/10, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > > >
> > > > More simply/clean, as you said, maybe; one advantage of keeping
> > > > the "raw" smp_read_barrier_depends() in get_trampoline_vaddr() is
> > > > that we can avoid it when area is NULL;
> > >
> > > Do you really think it makes sense to optimize out read_barrier_depends
> > here?
> > >
> > > It can only be NULL in handle_swbp(), and in this case we are going to
> > do a
> > > lot of work, and in particular install this xol vma,
> >
> > Not to mention that alpha doesn't support uprobes, so this all is currently
> > cosmetic.
> >
>
> Do you mean a "cosmetic" improvement over the current version? ;-)
Yes, if you mean "turn smp_read_barrier_depends into lockless_dereference" ;)
So I will be happy to ack this patch if you make it.
But "optimize out smp_read_barrier_depends if NULL" imho makes no sense.
And, speaking of get_trampoline_vaddr() in particular, it is a bit ugly anyway.
prepare_uretprobe() can not hit area == NULL and doesn't need a barrier, while
handle_swbp() actually wants is_trampoline(bp_vaddr). Not that I really think
this needs a cleanup, at least until we change this code to use multiple
trampolines (say, for different stacks).
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-09 18:18 [PATCH] events/uprobes: move smp_read_barrier_depends() where needed Andrea Parri
2016-06-10 7:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-10 12:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <CAPZ9YJY_6mB797YRG4=byTbz6WTH91GZjba9zDQhZ+J0C-khSg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-10 13:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-10 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <CAPZ9YJYPynX2vGgFarhiyUN0GF--h6r2kbhJ4pRt2NMY1qCODg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-10 19:36 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
[not found] ` <CAPZ9YJaxdqpCh9DyD7ubrTEhCL9jEdMzNN6zJHsOPYGN5NNPXg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-10 12:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160610193652.GA14622@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox