From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424447AbcFMOZr (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:25:47 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:30988 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423577AbcFMOZn (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:25:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,466,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="986440826" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:25:14 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Tan Jui Nee , heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, ptyser@xes-inc.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.yong@intel.com, ong.hock.yu@intel.com, weifeng.voon@intel.com, wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's Message-ID: <20160613142514.GA1740@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1465282553-28396-1-git-send-email-jui.nee.tan@intel.com> <1465282553-28396-3-git-send-email-jui.nee.tan@intel.com> <20160609140538.GL1791@lahna.fi.intel.com> <1465826071.30123.18.camel@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465826071.30123.18.camel@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:54:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Would work to me, though still the same question: is it possible to > avoid building it on even most of Intel platforms, since there, I > assume, will be not many users of the module? Well, even if you make it configurable via Kconfig, I guess distros will have to enable it in order to support as wide range of CPUs as possible in a single binary.