From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add support for skx
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:06:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613170622.02f0f80d@yairi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1853463.fUpAPaBi47@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:56:18 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, June 13, 2016 11:32:10 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, May 23, 2016 09:45:42 AM Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > SKX RAPL interface is similar to HSX/BDX.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c index 470bb62..a417e68 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > > @@ -1096,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[]
> > > __initconst = { RAPL_CPU(0x4E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Skylake */
> > > RAPL_CPU(0x4C, rapl_defaults_cht),/* Braswell/Cherryview
> > > */ RAPL_CPU(0x4A, rapl_defaults_tng),/* Tangier */
> > > + RAPL_CPU(0x55, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),/* Skylake
> > > server */ RAPL_CPU(0x56, rapl_defaults_core),/* Future Xeon */
> > > RAPL_CPU(0x5A, rapl_defaults_ann),/* Annidale */
> > > RAPL_CPU(0X5C, rapl_defaults_core),/* Broxton */
> > >
> >
> > Can you please rebase this on top of 4.7-rc3?
>
> Or rather on top of the x86/cpu branch from tip?
>
done. just sent you v2.
[PATCH v2] powercap/rapl: add support for denverton
> BTW, I can take the Denverton support for RAPL too (unless already
> applied elsewhere), but it has to be based on x86/cpu as well.
>
Not applied elsewhere, please take it. I was confused powercap/rapl with
perf/rapl which should be in tip.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 16:45 [PATCH 0/2] Misc RAPL updates Jacob Pan
2016-05-23 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add support for skx Jacob Pan
2016-06-13 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-13 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-14 0:06 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2016-06-14 0:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-14 14:47 ` Jacob Pan
2016-06-14 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-23 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce warning level Jacob Pan
2016-06-16 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613170622.02f0f80d@yairi \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox