From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] sched/fair: Fix attaching task sched avgs twice when switching to fair or changing task group
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:00:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616010041.GO8105@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615152217.GN30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:22:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:46:53AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > I still have concerned with this change of the behavior that attaches
> > the task only when it is enqueued. The load avg of the task will not
> > be decayed between the time we move it into its new group until its
> > enqueue. With this change, a task's load can stay high whereas it has
> > slept for the last couple of seconds. Then, its load and utilization
> > is no more accounted anywhere in the mean time just because we have
> > moved the task which will be enqueued on the same rq.
> > A task should always be attached to a cfs_rq and its load/utilization
> > should always be accounted on a cfs_rq and decayed for its sleep
> > period
>
> OK; so I think I agree with that.
Ok, I agree now. I think the following should fix (or sort out) the attach
twice problem Vincent discovered (SMP is needed, maybe move reset() into attach()).
static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p)
{
detach_task_cfs_rq(p);
set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
attach_task_cfs_rq(p);
/*
* If the cfs_rq's last_update_time is 0, attach the sched avgs
* won't be anything useful, as it will be decayed to 0 when any
* sched_entity is enqueued to that cfs_rq.
*
* On the other hand, if the cfs_rq's last_update_time is 0, we
* must reset the task's last_update_time to ensure we will attach
* the sched avgs when the task is enqueued.
*/
if (!cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->avg.last_update_time)
reset_task_last_update_time(p);
else
attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq_of(&p->se), &p->se);
}
Vincent, could you please verify?
> Does the below (completely untested,
> hasn't even been near a compiler) look reasonable?
Goodness. But mine is also fired now. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 22:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] sched/fair: Fix attach and detach sched avgs for task group change and sched class change Yuyang Du
2016-06-14 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] sched/fair: Fix attaching task sched avgs twice when switching to fair or changing task group Yuyang Du
2016-06-15 7:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-15 0:18 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-15 14:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-15 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 1:00 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-06-16 16:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-16 17:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 18:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-16 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 19:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-16 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 21:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 2:12 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-17 12:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] sched/fair: Move load and util avgs from wake_up_new_task() to sched_fork() Yuyang Du
2016-06-14 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] sched/fair: Skip detach sched avgs for new task when changing task groups Yuyang Du
2016-06-14 22:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] sched/fair: Add inline to detach_entity_load_evg() Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160616010041.GO8105@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox