From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933390AbcFPVgl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:36:41 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:59681 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754843AbcFPVgi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:36:38 -0400
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:36:35 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [REDO PATCH v7] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power
 reporting mechanism
Message-ID: <20160616213635.GD4002@pd.tnic>
References: <1457502306-2559-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606152104370.26137@macbook-air>
 <20160616053802.GA7810@hr-amur2>
 <20160616055933.GA8522@hr-amur2>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606161700500.2744@macbook-air>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606161713260.2744@macbook-air>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606161713260.2744@macbook-air>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:16:04PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> I'd believe the 6W report as a value for how much the CPU is using.
> The others seem spurious. I guess I should go check the Errata for
> this chip.

Maybe this is the reason why it got enabled on F15 only :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.