linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] x86/KASLR: Randomize virtual address separately
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:35:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160617083535.GA6996@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160617082026.GA4791@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > -unsigned char *choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
> > -				      unsigned long input_size,
> > -				      unsigned long output,
> > -				      unsigned long output_size)
> > +void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
> > +			    unsigned long input_size,
> > +			    unsigned long *output,
> > +			    unsigned long output_size,
> > +			    unsigned long *virt_addr)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long choice = output;
> >  	unsigned long random_addr;
> >  
> > +	/* By default, keep output position unchanged. */
> > +	*virt_addr = *output;
> 
> So I applied this, after fixing a conflict with a recent hibernation related 
> change, but it would be nice to further clean up the types in this file, in 
> particular could we please propagate 'const' for all input-only pointers?
> 
> For example in the above function it would be obvious at a glance if it said 
> something like:
> 
>  void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
> 			    unsigned long input_size,
> 			    const unsigned long *output,
> 			    unsigned long output_size,
> 			    unsigned long *virt_addr)
> 
> when reading such a function prototype I can immediately tell: 'yeah, while it's 
> named "output", it's in fact a read-only input parameter - the _real_ output of 
> the function is 'virt_addr'.)

Doh, so I managed to confuse myself by looking at the unpatched function only. 
This patch in fact starts writing to 'output':

+               /* Update the new physical address location. */
+               if (*output != random_addr) {
+                       add_identity_map(random_addr, output_size);
+                       *output = random_addr;
+               }

At which point 'output' cannot be const, and in fact it might be beneficial that 
'virt_addr' is passed in by a pointer as well.

The comment of the function definitely needs to be updated:

  * it takes the input and output pointers as 'unsigned long'.

... which is not true anymore.

I also find the type flow and naming for the 'output' pointer very confusing. We 
have:

asmlinkage __visible void *extract_kernel(void *rmode, memptr heap,
                                  unsigned char *input_data,
                                  unsigned long input_len,
                                  unsigned char *output,
                                  unsigned long output_len)

...

        choose_random_location((unsigned long)input_data, input_len,
                                (unsigned long *)&output,
                                max(output_len, kernel_total_size),
                                &virt_addr);


void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
                            unsigned long input_size,
                            unsigned long *output,
                            unsigned long output_size,
                            unsigned long *virt_addr)

...

                        *output = random_addr;


it is very easy to confuse 'unsigned long *output' with the 'char *output' pointer 
to the output stream! But in reality this is a double pointer and we want to use 
it to change the pointer.

So at minimum we should rename 'output' in choose_random_location() to something 
like 'output_ptr' - but even better would be to just preserve its natural type and 
use 'char * const *' and do a single type cast when setting it.

Same goes for 'virt_addr'.

Agreed?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-25 22:45 [PATCH v9 0/5] x86/KASLR: Randomize virtual address separately Kees Cook
2016-05-25 22:45 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations Kees Cook
2016-06-17 12:22   ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-06-26 11:01   ` tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-05-25 22:45 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] x86/KASLR: Clarify identity map interface Kees Cook
2016-06-17 12:22   ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-06-26 11:02   ` tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-05-25 22:45 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] x86/KASLR: Randomize virtual address separately Kees Cook
2016-06-17  8:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-17  8:35     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-06-17 12:22   ` [tip:x86/boot] " tip-bot for Baoquan He
2016-06-26 11:02   ` tip-bot for Baoquan He
2016-05-25 22:45 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] x86/KASLR: Add physical address randomization >4G Kees Cook
2016-06-17 12:23   ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/KASLR: Extend kernel image physical address randomization to addresses larger than 4G tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-06-26 11:02   ` tip-bot for Kees Cook
2016-05-25 22:45 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] x86/KASLR: Allow randomization below load address Kees Cook
2016-06-17  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-17 15:44     ` Kees Cook
2016-06-17 18:44       ` Yinghai Lu
2016-06-17 12:23   ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/KASLR: Allow randomization below the " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2016-06-26 11:03   ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160617083535.GA6996@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).