From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755564AbcFQN6e (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:58:34 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:3793 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754070AbcFQN6c (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:58:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,484,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="123970049" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:58:29 -0400 From: Dennis Dalessandro To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Ashutosh Dixit , "Marciniszyn, Mike" , Doug Ledford , "Hefty, Sean" , Hal Rosenstock , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: hfi1 use of PCI internals Message-ID: <20160617135828.GA26133@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> References: <20160616162052.GA2144@localhost> <20160616200817.GA17778@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160616200817.GA17778@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:08:17PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >As far as I can tell, none of these PCI questions were raised on >linux-pci, so we never even had a chance to have a conversation about >them. I'll let Ashutosh handle the technical details here since he is most familiar with the code in question. I just want to mention that the move out of staging doesn't imply the driver is done being developed. We are very much open to discussing whatever the PCI folks see as needing to be addressed. -Denny