Re: [Y2038] [PATCH] crypto: use timespec64 for jent_get_nstime

Stephan Mueller
2016-06-21T17:33:37Z

Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller:

Hi,

> > So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a
> > clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented.
>
> So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case.

I tested ktime_get_raw_ns and it exhibits the same results as
ktime_get_raw_fast_ns and RDTSC. So, I see no objections in using
ktime_get_raw_ns.

Ciao
Stephan