From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754752AbcFTTyP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:54:15 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:18298 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754666AbcFTTyH (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:54:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:53:26 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Jan Kara Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] ext4: underflow in alignment check Message-ID: <20160620195325.GM32247@mwanda> References: <20160616070709.GC23129@mwanda> <20160620160204.GG6882@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160620160204.GG6882@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:02:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 16-06-16 10:07:09, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > My static checker complains that this can underflow if arg is negative > > which is true. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > How come? (1 << 30) fits even into 32-bit signed type. So where's the > problem? Bad changelog... I was talking about a different issue. I was casting it to unsigned to take advantage of type promototion. Assume we have: int arg = 1 << 31; (arg > (1 << 30)) // <-- this is false (arg > (1U << 30)) // <-- this is true so there is no underflow. regards, dan carpenter