From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754836AbcFUE6L (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:58:11 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:42585 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751088AbcFUE6I (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:58:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:58:05 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Prarit Bhargava Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm-soc tree Message-ID: <20160621145805.4eac75b6@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/configs/bcm_defconfig between commit: 41463c3e6eae ("ARM: Remove bcm_defconfig") from the arm-soc tree and commit: c41079f16bf2 ("lib, switch CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME to int") from the akpm-current tree. I fixed it up (I just deleted the file) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell