From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752252AbcFVIcs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:32:48 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:33115 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750907AbcFVIcK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:32:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:31:17 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Honghui Zhang Cc: Eddie Huang , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , "treding@nvidia.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "robh@kernel.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "p.zabel@pengutronix.de" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "pebolle@tiscali.nl" , Kendrick Hsu =?utf-8?B?KOW+kOWtkOWHoSk=?= , "arnd@arndb.de" , srv_heupstream , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tfiga@google.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "djkurtz@google.com" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "l.stach@pengutronix.de" , Yingjoe Chen =?utf-8?B?KD8/6Iux5rSyKQ==?= , Youlin Pei =?utf-8?B?KOijtOWPi+aelyk=?= , Erin Lo =?utf-8?B?KD9f6ZuFP2cp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701 Message-ID: <20160622083117.GG11432@8bytes.org> References: <1465379461-14757-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <1465379461-14757-6-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <20160621095748.GE28248@8bytes.org> <1466574342.27791.8.camel@mtksdaap41> <1466581547.8787.18.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1466581547.8787.18.camel@mtksdaap41> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: > This one is based on CCF "arm: dts: mt2701: Add clock controller device > nodes"[1] and power domain patch "Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS power domain > support v7"[2], > But these two patchset are still being review now. > > Do you think it's better that I send this one later after ccf and power > domain patch got merged, and let Matthias take it? Sure, but the patches I already merged can stay in the tree for now? Joerg