From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com
Cc: gabriele.mzt@gmail.com, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
dvhart@infradead.org, kernel@kempniu.pl, luto@kernel.org,
alex.hung@canonical.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event codes
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622143817.GJ29844@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fdb239b17254606861aab4723b26599@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM>
On Wednesday 22 June 2016 14:34:01 Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:31 AM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> > Cc: gabriele.mzt@gmail.com; mjg59@srcf.ucam.org; dvhart@infradead.org;
> > kernel@kempniu.pl; luto@kernel.org; alex.hung@canonical.com; platform-
> > driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event
> > codes
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 June 2016 14:28:37 Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:24 AM
> > > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>
> > > > Cc: gabriele.mzt@gmail.com; mjg59@srcf.ucam.org;
> > dvhart@infradead.org;
> > > > kernel@kempniu.pl; luto@kernel.org; alex.hung@canonical.com;
> > platform-
> > > > driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI
> > event
> > > > codes
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday 22 June 2016 14:21:25 Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > For Linux I don’t think this is necessary and a NOOP is appropriate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is also a second place that some older laptops had a battery
> > > > "hotkey"
> > > > > > > that would also emit 0xE00E. This was also picked up by quickset
> > and
> > > > would
> > > > > > > show battery information.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This shouldn't be blocked by kernel, I'd expect if someone wants to
> > > > bind
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > to another application from userspace they should be able to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Great! Can I send patch after which 0xe00e will be send to input layer
> > as
> > > > > > event KEY_BATTERY?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well that's why I was mentioning this in two places. If it's received from
> > > > keyboard
> > > > > recoding it as KEY_BATTERY sounds appropriate to me. If it's received
> > from
> > > > WMI,
> > > > > it really shouldn't be set as anything for Linux to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think any apps will benefit from the notification to re-read
> > battery
> > > > > Information today.
> > > >
> > > > I mean for dell-wmi.c code.
> > > > Why it should not be set to anything on Linux?
> > > >
> > >
> > > On Windows Quickset is a separate application from built-in Windows
> > battery
> > > applet. It shows similar types of information as gnome-power-manager
> > does,
> > > but because it's not part of the OS, it doesn't get notifications like this so
> > > special BIOS hooks are in place for it to know when to re-read battery
> > > information.
> > >
> > > On Linux, there are already infrastructure for battery removal and adding
> > > notifications from ACPI. Sending this up to user space won't be useful.
> >
> > Errr. I mean WMI event 0xe00e which you wrote is emitted when user press
> > battery key. And I think this event should be sent by dell-wmi.c as
> > KEY_BATTERY.
> >
>
> No, I mean 0xe00e scancode is emitted when user presses the battery key on
> older laptops. I'm only mentioning it because it happens to have the same
> scancode as is received for WMI for another purpose and I wanted to make sure
> it was clear what both are for.
> This button press isn't emitted via WMI, it's over standard serio.
>
> The event received over WMI for battery refresh that shares the same code shouldn't
> be emitted as KEY_BATTERY to the OS is all I was trying to say.
Ah right, sorry I was confused. WMI e00e is that battery insert/delete
event which we should ignore in dell-wmi.
So I will prepare patch which disable e00e event in dell-wmi.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-22 11:36 [PATCH 0/4] dell-wmi: Changes in WMI event code handling Pali Rohár
2016-05-22 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] dell-wmi: Ignore WMI event code 0xe045 Pali Rohár
2016-05-22 11:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] dell-wmi: Sort WMI event codes and update comments Pali Rohár
2016-06-02 10:41 ` Michał Kępień
2016-06-07 22:03 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-08 19:48 ` Darren Hart
2016-06-08 19:57 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-08 20:15 ` Darren Hart
2016-06-08 20:27 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-08 20:43 ` Darren Hart
2016-06-08 20:49 ` Pali Rohár
2016-05-22 11:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event codes Pali Rohár
2016-05-26 22:04 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-07 23:00 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-08 6:02 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-08 10:44 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-15 19:51 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-21 19:51 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 7:56 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-22 13:40 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 14:12 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-22 14:21 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 14:24 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-22 14:28 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 14:31 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-22 14:34 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-22 14:38 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2016-06-22 14:39 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-22 14:46 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-06-02 10:41 ` Michał Kępień
2016-06-07 22:06 ` Pali Rohár
2016-05-22 11:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] dell-wmi: Rework code for generating sparse keymap and processing WMI events Pali Rohár
2016-05-23 17:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-02 10:42 ` Michał Kępień
2016-06-07 22:30 ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-02 10:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] dell-wmi: Changes in WMI event code handling Michał Kępień
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160622143817.GJ29844@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com \
--cc=alex.hung@canonical.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox